Talking about trauma, with care
Most of us will, at some point, be the person someone decides to tell. Here is how to ask without prying, how to listen without flinching, what not to say, and what to do if the telling goes somewhere neither of you expected.
By Reid Robison, MD. 2,096 words, with five scenes to practice on and a set of sentences to say instead.
We teach this to the team members who do screenings at my research site, because a trauma study has to confirm that a trauma happened before anyone can join, and that confirmation has to be done without hurting the person on the other end. The principles turned out to be the same ones I'd want my own friends to know. So this is that lesson, rewritten for everyone: the friend at dinner, the parent, the partner, the nurse, the manager who notices someone unraveling at work.
Two facts frame everything. First, trauma is not rare. In the WHO's surveys across 24 countries, about seven in ten adults reported at least one event that would qualify, and most reported several.1 Whoever you are talking to has probably been through something. Second, how people respond when a survivor first tells them is one of the strongest predictors of how that person does afterward. In the two big meta-analyses of what predicts PTSD, lack of social support after the event outranked nearly everything about the event itself, including how severe it was.2,3 The response you give is not a courtesy. It is, in a measurable way, part of the treatment, or part of the injury.
- Ask about existence, not detail. "Did something like that happen to you?" is enough. The story is theirs to offer.
- Give control back at every turn. Control is what trauma took. Every "you don't have to" returns a piece of it.
- Never ask why. "Why didn't you leave / tell someone / fight back" is heard as blame, every time, no matter how it was meant.
- Silence is not a gap. After a disclosure, the quiet is the person checking whether it was safe. Let it be.
- If they go somewhere, bring them back. Name, place, feet on the floor, five senses. Then stop the story.
- Believe them, and say so. Negative reactions to disclosure, disbelief, blame, being told to move on, are reliably linked to worse outcomes.
What a trauma is, and isn't
The word has stretched to cover almost any bad experience, which is generous in spirit and unhelpful in practice. In psychiatry it has a definition. For a diagnosis of PTSD, the DSM requires what it calls a Criterion A event: exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual violence, whether it happened to you, you witnessed it, you learned it happened to someone close, or you were exposed to the aftermath repeatedly, as first responders are.4 A divorce is not a Criterion A event. A car crash is. Being bullied through middle school is not, by the letter; being assaulted once is. This is not a ranking of suffering. It is what keeps PTSD a specific thing with specific treatments, and it is worth knowing because the people who have been through a Criterion A event often doubt that their experience "counts." It counts.
What happens afterward is less about the event than about what the nervous system does with it. Judith Herman's description from 1992 still holds: trauma overwhelms the ordinary systems that give people a sense of control, connection and meaning, and recovery runs in the reverse order, safety first, then remembrance and mourning, then reconnection.5 When you are the person someone tells, you are standing at the first step. Your whole job is safety.
The gate, not the story
Here is the single idea that reorganizes everything else. When someone discloses, there are two different things you could be asking about: whether something happened, and what happened. The first is a gate. The second is the story. Almost all the damage done by well-meaning listeners comes from walking through the gate and asking for the story, because the story is where the trauma lives, and asking for it puts the survivor back inside it on your timetable instead of theirs.
"Something like that happened to you." A yes or a no, or a nod. It tells you what kind of conversation this is and what the person needs. It can be confirmed in one sentence, and it is all you need to be useful.
What happened, when, who, how. It belongs to the person. It may come out today, in a year, in therapy, or never, and every one of those is fine. Your job is not to get it. Your job is to be someone it would be safe to tell.
In a clinical interview the story is gathered carefully, with a structured instrument, by someone trained for it, with time set aside and support in place.6 At a dinner table, in a car, on a phone call, none of those conditions hold. So the rule for the rest of us is simple: confirm the gate, gently, and then let the person decide how much of the story to hand you.
Say it two ways
Most of what goes wrong is reflex: a question that sounds caring and lands as interrogation. Here are the reflexes, with the sentence to say instead. The second column is blurred; guess before you click.
The reflex, and the sentence instead
Same intention, different effect.
Notice the shape. The reflexes ask for information, assign responsibility, or reach for a silver lining. The replacements give control back, believe, and stay. That is the whole grammar of a trauma-informed conversation, and once you can hear it, you can improvise the rest.
Five scenes
Practice is cheaper here than anywhere else. Five scenes, three responses each. Pick the one you would actually say.
What would you say?
Composite scenes. There is a best answer in each, and a reason.
Six principles, from the people who wrote them down
"Trauma-informed" has become a buzzword, which is a shame, because the thing it names is specific. SAMHSA's 2014 framework, the one most hospitals and schools borrowed, lists six principles.7 They were written for organizations. They work just as well for a person.
Physical and emotional. Private enough to talk, no surprises, no sudden moves. Ask before touching.
Say what you will do and do it. If you will have to tell someone else, say so before they tell you, not after.
Other people who have been through it are often the best help. Knowing where that support exists is part of the job.
Decisions are made with the person, not for them. Even the decision about whether to keep talking.
Offer options rather than instructions. "Would you rather talk now or later?" beats "tell me."
What counts as safe, what can be said aloud, and to whom, varies. Ask rather than assume.
Underneath all six is the research finding that gave this field its urgency. When survivors of sexual assault are asked what happened when they told people, those who met disbelief, blame, being controlled, or being told to get over it had markedly more severe PTSD, and the effect held across a meta-analysis of dozens of studies.8,9 Rebecca Campbell's work on what happens to rape survivors inside medical and legal systems has a name for it: secondary victimization, the injury done by the response.10 You do not need to be a system to do this. One sentence at a kitchen table can do it too. The good news is symmetric: one sentence can also be the first safe place the person has found.
If it goes somewhere
Sometimes the telling tips over. The person's voice changes, their eyes go somewhere else, their breathing shifts, they stop responding, or they begin to shake or cry in a way that does not look like ordinary crying. This is the nervous system doing what it learned to do during the original event, and it means the conversation has stopped being a conversation. The story has to stop.
- Say their name, in a normal voice.Not louder. Normal is the point: it says the present is ordinary and safe.
- Say where you are and when."We're in my kitchen. It's Tuesday evening. It's 2026." Orientation is the opposite of a flashback.
- Ask them to feel their feet on the floor, and to press them down.Then their hands on their thighs. Then five things they can see, four they can hear, three they can touch.
- Breathe with them, slowly, out longer than in.Do it yourself first, audibly. Nervous systems copy each other.
- Do not touch them without asking.Offer a hand, palm up. Let them take it or not.
- When they are back, stop the story."We don't need to go further tonight." It is not an abandonment; it is the opposite.
This is grounding, and it is the same thing trauma therapists do, in the same order, for the same reason: the body has to know it is safe before the mind can do anything useful.11,12,13 If the person cannot come back, or says anything about wanting to die, the conversation becomes a different one. Stay with them, and get help: a crisis line, an emergency department, someone who can be physically present. In the US, 988 by call or text, any hour.
And if the telling goes well, which it usually does, there is one more thing worth knowing. The trauma-focused therapies have some of the strongest evidence in all of psychiatry, with several first-line treatments and good remission rates, and most people who get them improve substantially.14 "Should I see someone?" deserves a hopeful, specific yes.
What this costs you
Being told is not free. People who listen to trauma for a living get a form of it themselves, a secondary traumatic stress that looks like the real thing: intrusive images of someone else's worst day, irritability, numbness, a dread of the next conversation.15 Friends and family get it too, and nobody warns them.
So, three things. Do not carry it alone; you can talk about how it affected you without repeating what you were told. Keep a boundary on how much you take in at once, and say so kindly when you reach it: "I want to hear all of this, and I think I need to do it in pieces." And remember that you are not the treatment. You are the first safe place. The treatment is a job for someone with training and time, and the kindest thing you can do, after believing someone, is help them find it.
This post is education, not treatment, and it is not a substitute for crisis help. If you or someone with you is in danger or thinking about suicide, in the US call or text 988, or go to the nearest emergency department. This piece grew out of the PTSD chapter of my Psychiatry Wiki.
References
- Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, et al. Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017;8(sup5):1353383.
- Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD. Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(5):748–766.
- Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, Weiss DS. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(1):52–73.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed., text revision (DSM-5-TR). APA; 2022.
- Herman JL. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence. Basic Books; 1992.
- Weathers FW, Bovin MJ, Lee DJ, et al. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): development and initial psychometric evaluation. Psychol Assess. 2018;30(3):383–395.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA's Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884; 2014.
- Ullman SE, Filipas HH. Predictors of PTSD symptom severity and social reactions in sexual assault victims. J Trauma Stress. 2001;14(2):369–389.
- Dworkin ER, Brill CD, Ullman SE. Social reactions to disclosure of interpersonal violence and psychopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;72:101750.
- Campbell R. The psychological impact of rape victims' experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. Am Psychol. 2008;63(8):702–717.
- van der Kolk B. The Body Keeps the Score. Viking; 2014.
- Levine PA. Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma. North Atlantic Books; 1997.
- Cloitre M, Courtois CA, Charuvastra A, Carapezza R, Stolbach BC, Green BL. Treatment of complex PTSD: results of the ISTSS expert clinician survey on best practices. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24(6):615–627.
- American Psychological Association. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adults. 2017.
- Figley CR, ed. Compassion Fatigue: Coping with Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder in Those Who Treat the Traumatized. Brunner/Mazel; 1995.